07/23/12 – Today’s Bottom Tweets, Jeff Saut, Edson Gould © ™

CHART LINK – at StockCharts

MY TWEETS – Follow my tweets to avoid missing updates.  My Twitter name is BobsWaveCounts



Buy – June 28, 2012 and July 12 (waiting to buy again)

Sold – Bressert System parts #1 & #2 have been sold.

Buying (or shorting) 3 parts simultaneously and then selling (or covering) one part on 3 separate dates is very confusing to list.  The initial 3 steps up (or down) means part #1 is liquidated (lock in the profit).  Trend warnings and sell notices mean another part is liquidated (lock in more profit on part #2).   Depending on the importance of the turn or warning, part #3 could be liquidated.

At some point another 3 part purchase (or short) begins the cycle again.


LONG TERM – Up in black 3, chart #10.8

INTERMEDIATE TERM –  Up in blue 3, chart #10.6

SHORT TERM – Correction under way



If you followed my tweets this morning, you would have seen me nail the bottom in real time (my bottom tweet was at 7:02 AM PDT).  First bottom in the SPX futures contract was at 6:50 AM PDT, second bottom was at 7:16 AM PDT, difference between the 2 bottoms was 70 cents (first bottom was lowest).

After the close, I said we had 3 steps up and should correct again.

Now let’s watch the correction to see if it stays above the morning low and the market continues higher.  If that happens, the next rally would be step 2 up from this morning’s bottom.  If the low doesn’t hold, we will be off into step 2 down of the correction.  The rally began today at SPX 1337 (Jeff Saut’s target zone).  Below SPX 1290 significantly or for very long would make Jeff Saut very anxious.  We’ll see what happens (as always).

When viewing my tweets, you need to “expand” them to see the actual time that I filed the note.  The h or m immediately to the right of my icon is only an estimate.  The following tweets have been expanded.


Time displayed is Pacific Daylight Time

3 steps up completed. Watch next 3 step decline to see if it stops short of this morning’s low & following rally is impulse – then buy

1:08 PM – 23 Jul 12 via web · Details

Looks like 2 steps up since this morning’s low. We “should” have step 3 and then down more. Gotta keep our options open for trend changes.

12:06 PM – 23 Jul 12 via web · Details

That was a good call this morning (patting myself on the back). Probably more down when rally done. See chart #10.4 @ http://stockcharts.com/public/1169350 

10:38 AM – 23 Jul 12 via web · Details

FTSE has a higher bottom. We “could” rally right now. We’ll see, but I have to take RV in for service. I miss all the fun. Damn!

7:02 AM – 23 Jul 12 via Twitter for iPad · Details

Larger bottom could come later in the week with a sustained rally.

6:46 AM – 23 Jul 12 via Twitter for iPad · Details

I could be counting sub-divisions of a wave??? First higher high & higher low confirms a bigger rally. Overall probably more on downside.

6:45 AM – 23 Jul 12 via Twitter for iPad · Details

That’s one rally. The next rally will be more sustained. Probably a double bottom & then up. Soon!

6:34 AM – 23 Jul 12 via Twitter for iPad · Details

Continuing from last note – the larger rally should begin today.

6:18 AM – 23 Jul 12 via Twitter for iPad · Details

Just a guess, but I think on the 2nd small rally from now, that rally will turn into something bigger than what’s been seen since Friday

6:14 AM – 23 Jul 12 via Twitter for iPad · Details



July 23, 2012

Wall Street folklore suggests that in 10 years any fool can make every mistake there is in the stock market and that a really smart person can do the same in half the time. I don’t know how long it took me, but I have tried to learn from those mistakes and avoid repeating them! Indeed, everybody who finally learns how to make money in the stock market learns his own way. I like this tale.

Right after I was discharged from the Army at the close of World War II and went into the drilling-rig building business, I began buying and selling stocks on the side, at first as a hobby. At the end of each year I always had a net loss. I tried every approach I would read or hear about: technical, fundamental, and combinations of all these, but somehow I always ended up with a loss. It may sound impossible that even a blind man would have lost money on the rally of 1958 – but I did. In my in-and-out trading and smart switches I lost a lot of money.

But one day in 1961 when, discouraged and frustrated, I was in the Merrill Lynch office in Houston, a senior account executive sitting at a front desk whom I knew observed the frown on my face that he had been seeing for so many years and motioned me over to his desk. ‘Would you like to see a man,’ he asked wearily, ‘who has never lost money on the stock market?’ ‘Never had a loss?’ I stammered. ‘Never had a loss on balance,’ the broker drawled, ‘and I have handled his account for nearly 40 years.’ ‘If you want to meet him, you’d better hurry,’ the broker advised. ‘He only comes in here once every few years except when he’s buying.’

I introduced myself. The stranger, to my surprise, was happy to talk about stocks. He pulled a sheet of paper from his pocket with his list of stocks scrawled in pencil on it that he had just finished selling and let me look at it. I couldn’t believe my eyes! The man had made over 50% long-term-capital-gain profits on the whole group. One stock in the group of 30 stocks had been shot off the board, but others had gone up 100%, 200%, and even 500%. He explained his technique, which was the ultimate in simplicity. When during a bear market he would read in the papers that the market was down to new lows and the experts were predicting that is was sure to drop hundreds of points more on the Dow, the farmer would look through a Standard & Poor’s Stock Guide and select around 30 stocks that had fallen in price below $10 – solid, profit-making, unheard of little companies (pecan growers, home furnishings, etc.) – and paid dividends. He would come to Houston and buy a $50,000 ‘package’ of them. And then, one, two, three, or four years later, when the stock market was bubbling, and the papers were talking about the Dow soaring to new highs, he would come to town and sell his whole package. It was as simple as that.

… The Craft of Investing by John Train

Well, it’s not quite that simple. You have to go against conventional wisdom following this type of investing philosophy. You have to learn how to go opposite of the markets. You have to be smart enough and brave enough to see that sometimes the emperor has no clothes. Most people want to follow the crowd; in essence, they want to follow the popular trend. Remember in February 2000 when the popular trend was “tech” and the conventional “call” was, “The Internet-related companies are the only ones worth owning right now!” Well, gold was the buy back then not tech stocks. Indeed, in this business it often pays to buy “panic” and “sell” euphoria.

This “buy the panic and sell euphoria” style of investing was taken to an art form by legendary investor Jim Rogers of Quantum Fund (George Soros) fame. Rogers defines hysteria (euphoria) and panic as the following:

Wait until markets start moving in [price] gaps. The hysteria, in and of itself however, is only a catalyst to make us look and see what’s going on. It does not mean you have to do anything. Look for hysteria to see if you should go the opposite way, but don’t go the opposite way until you have fully examined it. Also, remember that the world is always changing. Be aware of change. You should be willing to buy or sell anything. So many people say, ‘I could never buy that kind of stock.’ ‘I could never buy utilities.’ You should be flexible and alert to investing in, or selling, anything.

Most recently, corn has been gapping to the upside in the charts, as can be seen in the attendant chart on page 3. It was back on May 21, 2011 when I first mentioned corn’s “lift off” move by scribing, “Interestingly, the big winners last week were wheat (+15.2%) and corn (+9.3%), possibly because the Intercontinental Exchange (ICE/$131.09/Strong Buy) began trading grain future contracts for the first time.” Subsequently, corn prices have soared some 43% as the drought sweeping the Corn Belt has devastated the corn crop. Also impacting corn prices has been the drought in Russia. While the simultaneous droughts are tragic (June was this country’s third driest month in 118 years), global production of corn is still expected grow smartly.

Meanwhile, back at the ranch, ranchers are liquidating their cattle herds because the cost of grain to feed them is crushing profit margins. So while grain prices are “on stilts,” the rush to the slaughter house has left cattle prices under pressure. Ladies and gentlemen, the gestation period for a cow is longer than that of a woman (~290 days vs. ~260). Moreover, a cow can only have one calf per year. Indeed, the beef cattle cycle is not like that of a “dark” assembly plant where you can just flip a switch and start producing widgets. Verily, once the herd is liquidated it takes a long time before beef production can ramp back up. The insight is that once the liquidation process is complete, beef prices should start to rise with positive investment implications for select companies. At the same time, when it becomes apparent that while our grain crops are in trouble world supplies are not, the current upside “euphoria” in corn prices should subside. As a sidebar, wheat speculators have their largest “net long” long position since 1998; and such extremes have tended to be a contrary indicator. Indeed, buy panic and sell euphoria.

While commodities are “gapping” upward, the stock market is not, as last week was the mirror image of the previous week. To be sure, the previous week saw declines until Thursday’s Dow Delight (+203) erased those losses. Last week saw the early week gains evaporate with Friday’s Dow Dump (-120). Friday’s Fade should have come as no surprise to listeners of these comments, for in Thursday morning’s strategy comments I opined, “For short-term trading types, I think we either stall today (Thursday) at slightly higher prices, or we get a pullback off of some kind of intraday high today.” The media’s causa proximafor the late week slide ranged from weakening economic reports (five of last week’s reports were better than expected, nine were weaker, and two in-line), softening earnings reports (61.4% of companies’ reports have beaten estimates, 44.1% have beaten revenue estimates, but only 2% have raised forward guidance), the nastiest Presidential campaign ever, the approaching financial cliff combined with an intransigent Congress, Euroquake, etc. However, I think the overriding reason for the sell-off was the Spanish Finance Minister’s statement, “There is no money in the public coffers [and] there is no money to pay for public services.” With that statement, the yield on the 10-year Spanish sovereign debt found itself back above 7% (for perspective, however, recall that in 1993 / 1994 Spanish debt yields were hovering around 13%). Adding to the negative environment was that Germany’s wealthiest state (Bavaria) is openly protesting bailing out the “Greeces” of the world and is taking that protest to court.

By Friday’s closing bell the S&P 500 (SPX/1362.66) was higher for the week by a mere 0.43% with most of the other indices I follow either up or down by about the same amount, except for the NASDAQ 100 (NDX/2618.04), which was better by 1.28%. The result left the SPX chart looking like a double-top configuration, yet to me there still was not a lot of technical deterioration with the SPX remaining comfortably above its 50-day moving average (@1333.25). Interestingly, the S&P’s 10 macro sectors possessed the “cognitive dissonance” discussed in last Monday’s missive. To wit, consumer discretionary stocks got hammered (even the ones that beat earnings estimates). Ditto the financials despite the fact the average financial stock bested estimates. Conversely, the energy sector was up 2.56% last week even with many of the energy stock missing their respective earnings estimates. The weekly win left 93% of the energy sector stocks above their 50-DMAs (see chart on page 3) and that move was powered by crude oil’s rise of about 20% since the last week of June. Said rally, however, has carried “black gold” back to over $90/bbl where there is significant overhead resistance in the charts, which is why I said in Friday’s verbal comments, “I would be careful with the energy stocks in the short-term.”

The call for this week: In Thursday morning’s verbal strategy comments I said I was looking for a trading top off of that day’s intraday “high,” but that I didn’t think the subsequent selling would gain much downside traction. The reasons for said stance are that my proprietary money flow indicators showed the decline was more about a withdrawal of buying power rather than a pickup in selling pressure, there was only one “top warning” from my indicators, my “risk indicators” were down on all indices, Wall Street strategists have the lowest allocation to equities in 15 years, and the AAII bullish sentiment reading dropped from 30.2% to 22.2% for the largest weekly wilt since April. Historically, with AAII readings this low the SPX saw a move higher every time. So, this continues to look like a typical pullback after a nice run to the upside rather than the beginning of a major correction. Nevertheless, the recent rally has been the weakest rally from an intermediate cycle low since the cyclical bull market began in March 2009. Moreover, despite last Friday’s upward bias option expiration the equity markets closed near the lows for the sessions and that is a distinct change of pattern. And this morning we see why given the news from abroad. If futures open where they are indicated it would put the SPX back down into the 1330 – 1340 support zone. Failing that support brings into view the often mentioned 1290 – 1300 level. I continue like the strategy of gingerly accumulating the non-stock market correlated names so often featured in these reports as we await a decisive/sustained upside breakout above the 1360 – 1366 level.


Jeffrey Saut of Raymond James is a very savvy guy and one of the few people that I follow.   I found Jeff among the talking heads on CNBC, which is normally filled with worthless bobble-headed people. When I saw Jeff the first time, he was  telling the audience different ideas than what everyone else was regurgitating.  Immediately this catches my attention because I’m ALWAYS interested in anyone that has a mind apart from Wall Street.  After listening to him over time, I realized this guy is smart, insightful and normally right on the mark.  I find people like this very infrequently.

He reminds me of Robert Farrell of Merrill Lynch (70s and 80s), who achieved a large following by being frequently on target.  Jeff Saut is an acknowledged student of Bob Farrell.

Website for Raymond James Investment Planning



The following is an illustration of Edson Gould’s uncanny abilities as a market technician.  This is from my copy of “Edson Gould’s 1974 Forecast” issued in Feb 1974.

Edson Gould’s Last 100 Points – Oct 1972

The peak was 1067 on January 11, 1973.

The January 1973 sell recommendation was also remarkable.  It proves that Gould was an excellent wave counter because there is no other method of hitting a peak within 3 days.  He staked his reputation on that sell recommendation and became a huge bear at that point.  Other good methods can put you in the ball park, but not within 3 days.  He was issuing a seldom used sell recommendation and in hindsight he was dead on correct.  He knew that a big bear market had just begun, one that would carve off about 50% of the market’s valuation.

Edson Gould’s January 16, 1973 Sell Recommendation

And then on December 18, 1974, he declared the bear market dead and issued a buy recommendation.  He was the greatest!!!

Edson Gould’s December 18, 1974 Buy Recommendation

At that time, I wouldn’t have dared to disagree with the master, but many years later I thought his labeling of the bear market was incorrect.  Horrors – sacrilegious and blasphemous lies against the master.  Yeah, it is pretty bad but I only have room for 3 or 5 counts in my method.

Gould miscounted and should have called the end to the bear on the October 1974 bottom.  This became evident when we only had 2 steps up before the next sustained correction.  Counting October as step 1 up, everything lined up very nicely with 3 steps up.  Plus we would only have 3 steps down instead of 4.  It’s just one of those debatable points where it doesn’t really matter how you called it because either way made you lots of money and that’s the end game to what we do here.





All Rights Reserved  © ™

Explore posts in the same categories: 2 - EDSON GOULD, JEFF SAUT, UPDATE

Leave A Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: